Published on February 5th, 2018 |
by Cynthia Shahan
February 5th, 2018 by Cynthia Shahan
Children are everyone’s hope for positive change. They are every country’s most valuable resource. Children make life sparkle and remind one of the most meaningful parts of life. Perhaps that is one main reason why critical health issues for children are so heartbreaking. Those health issues seem all the more tragic when they come from decisions that humans didn’t have to make, from not thinking through the options in the best overall way.
Clear thinking, critical thinking such as found at the Sierra Club supports positive improvements in children’s lives — well beyond the lip service that hides a kick in the lungs and DNA of a child. “Children are among the most vulnerable to health impacts from air pollution caused by diesel emissions, in part because of their higher respiration rates but also due to the long bus rides that many children take daily.”
I’ve met people involved in the Sierra Club’s clean air efforts for children. I know their sincerity first hand as they aim to strengthen the work of the Sierra Club. I know they care, are informed, are active, and are influencing change for better air and water. I spoke with Phil Compton last year about the possibility of good outcomes after Volkswagen admitted to cheating on diesel-emissions tests. He was hopeful at that time that Florida would use the money to invest in electric buses.
The Sierra Club points out: “The automaker was forced to pay more than $15 billion, including $2.7 billion to states for investment in plans that reduce harmful emissions from the transportation sector and help offset the 40 times more pollution it illegally dumped into our air. One of the few specific ways states can choose to invest their funds is by replacing or retrofitting polluting school buses.”
As children are among the most vulnerable to health impacts from air pollution, genuine concern and action need to come from the politicians who suggest that they are family- and children-oriented public servants.
EV Obsession earlier wrote: “Even relatively ‘low’ levels of common air pollution damage the lung functioning of children, according to a new study published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care.” The study found that children living within 100 meters of a major highway had, on average, lung function around 6% lower than that of children living 400 or more meters away from major highways.
CleanTechnica in a separate article wrote: “Exposure to high levels of traffic-related air pollution is seemingly a direct cause of the type of DNA damage that is known as telomere shortening, according to new research from the University of California, Berkeley.”
The Sierra Club continues: “States are now designing their mitigation plans, and many are considering using their funds to invest in clean, zero-emission buses to replace their aging fleets.”
South Carolina wants to replace its 15-year-old school buses; Oregon is looking to replace 450 school buses and is considering adopting electric school buses; Colorado plans to electrify its school buses using about 25 percent of its funds, and Washington State is investing nearly 50 percent of its $112 million into upgrading buses, including school bus fleets. Residents of New Mexico, where it is estimated that 1 in 11 students suffers from asthma and other respiratory problems, recently urged Governor Martinez to invest its VW settlement funds in electric school buses. These are just a few examples, with more expected to be announced in the coming months.
Electric school bus manufacturers include Lion, Starcraft, TransTech, and Blue Bird, which released two electric school bus models just last year. They can travel up to 100 miles on a single charge, which meets student travel needs in most major cities — the places where we have some of our dirtiest air. As battery efficiency continues to improve, students in rural areas will be able to benefit from clean, zero emission buses, too.
Electric buses are more expensive upfront, but the math shows they are less expensive to fuel and repair than their diesel counterparts. Diesel buses rely on expensive fuel and maintenance, which electric buses don’t need. Higher initial costs for electric school bus adoption are also recouped several times over when their huge benefits to our air and our kids’ health are factored in.
The Sierra Club is collaborating with various community stakeholders and state leaders across the U.S. as states begin to design their plans to spend this clean transportation funding (tens of millions per state). We are advocating that the funds be spent on 1) electric charging stations; and 2) electric school bus, transit bus, and port vehicles. Funds could be spent on compressed natural gas vehicles, diesel retrofits, or propane vehicles, but vehicle electrification is the cleanest type of investment and the wisest choice for states. We are also working to ensure that plans are equitably designed. When state leaders include environmental justice and equity in their investment plans, the communities most impacted by air pollution won’t get left behind in the clean vehicle revolution.
The Sierra Club is working alongside the League of Conservation Voters’ Chispa program’s Clean Buses for Healthy Niños campaign to urge states to invest their VW funds in electric school bus adoption and address the disproportionate impact air pollution has on Latino students. One thing we are noticing in our diverse coalition efforts across the nation is an enormous amount of public interest in the electrification of school bus fleets, regardless of location, political affiliation, or demographics.
Parents, school officials, and environmental groups aren’t the only ones pushing for electric buses — some utility companies are also advocating for their adoption, including Duke, Indianapolis Power and Light (IP&L), Consumers Energy, and other utilities in the Midwest, through recent pilot and educational programs.
Other regions that have piloted electric school buses includes Massachusetts, which adopted four electric school buses thanks to a grant it jumped on from the Department of Energy Resources (DOER); and Kings Canyon Unified School District in California where there are now four Trans Tech SSTe Type A electric buses in operation. If you’re interested in making the switch to electric school buses in your area, our friends at the Vermont Energy Investment Corporation (VEIC) can help. They’ve developed a number of resources to help you get started.
Some things we can bet on never changing when it comes to school buses. They’ll likely always remain yellow and kids will never stop shoving their chewed gum on the underside of the seats — but, as we begin to see more electric school buses arrive to transport our children, we’ll see that these clean buses make a difference where it matters most: Cleaning the air for our children and teaching them that a clean transportation future is possible.
To learn more about how to use VW settlement funding for electric school buses, sign up to attend this February 8 LCV Chispa webinar that Mary will be speaking on.
Latest posts by Nino Plevnik (see all)
- Electric Vehicles, Solution or Diversion Or Updated Tulip Frenzy? - February 23, 2018
- BMW Group Signs Deal to Build Electric Minis in China - February 23, 2018
- Tesla charging, grim climate studies, Mercedes diesels, Outlander PHEV updates: Today’s Car News - February 23, 2018